Just Gaming
Jean-François Lyotard (DrE, Literature, University of Paris X, 1971) was a French philosopher and literary theorist. He is well-known for his articulation of postmodernism after the late 1970s and for his analysis of the impact of postmodernity on the human condition.He went to primary school at the Paris Lycées Buffon and Louis-le-Grand and later began studying philosophy at the Sorbonne. AfterThis was the primary source for my undergraduate thesis, which was written ten years ago and defended ten years ago to the month. I figured I should dust it off and see what I thought about it now after all these years, maybe see how much the book has aged or I've aged in the meantime. Fortunately, I think both have stood the test of time. The book is still a very enjoyable read for philosophy (that it's a conversation adds to the liveliness and accessibility), though certain parts didn't quite
A pretty good book on the concept of justice in the contemporary era.
Lyotard and Thébaud open Just Gaming by discussing Ls Libidinal Economy, a book L argues aims to produce effects rather than state truths (3). T sees Ls book as thus irresponsible, but L asserts all writingat least in modernityis irresponsible (8). For in modernityunlike in classicismthe author no longer knows for whom he writes (9). The dialogic approach of Just Gaming, however, situates it in a different language game than modern texts (8)at least until it becomes a book.L points to
a very useful elaboration of the ideas in the postmodern condition, relayed in the form of an ancient greek philosophic slapboxing contest. i mischaracterize: it's not that contentious. jean-loup could have been more difficult, but he comes around. we go here through the mess of how multiplicities of language games make it so that justice is entirely contingent, that a law for all sorts of situations doesn't really work, and he goes over the different situations of why it doesn't work. i don't
Jean-François Lyotard
Paperback | Pages: 136 pages Rating: 3.91 | 85 Users | 4 Reviews
Point Books To Just Gaming
Original Title: | Just Gaming (Theory and History of Literature, Vol 20) |
ISBN: | 0816612773 (ISBN13: 9780816612772) |
Edition Language: | English |
Explanation As Books Just Gaming
This was the primary source for my undergraduate thesis, which was written ten years ago and defended ten years ago to the month. I figured I should dust it off and see what I thought about it now after all these years, maybe see how much the book has aged or I've aged in the meantime. Fortunately, I think both have stood the test of time. The book is still a very enjoyable read for philosophy (that it's a conversation adds to the liveliness and accessibility), though certain parts didn't quite grab me as much now as then. Nonetheless, many of the same parts still resonated and a few new ideas popped out, particularly in relation to the internet and its tidal wave of information: a world that Lyotard (I'm assuming) would think of as a form of paganism or "pagan politics," of judging without criteria, of writing without finality, etc. I would recommend it to anyone interested in listening to a French theorist thinking out loud with an accomplice and covering a wide range of topics with ease and flair. In the end, if you're interested in what justice could look like in a world in which there are no authors or authorities, read this and you might get inspired. (Or you might get deflated, who knows?) And if you're only interested in aesthetic matters, the book is even better.List Containing Books Just Gaming
Title | : | Just Gaming |
Author | : | Jean-François Lyotard |
Book Format | : | Paperback |
Book Edition | : | Special Edition |
Pages | : | Pages: 136 pages |
Published | : | December 31st 1985 by Univ Of Minnesota Press (first published October 1985) |
Categories | : | Philosophy. Theory. Cultural. France |
Rating Containing Books Just Gaming
Ratings: 3.91 From 85 Users | 4 ReviewsAppraise Containing Books Just Gaming
This was the primary source for my undergraduate thesis, which was written ten years ago and defended ten years ago to the month. I figured I should dust it off and see what I thought about it now after all these years, maybe see how much the book has aged or I've aged in the meantime. Fortunately, I think both have stood the test of time. The book is still a very enjoyable read for philosophy (that it's a conversation adds to the liveliness and accessibility), though certain parts didn't quiteJean-François Lyotard (DrE, Literature, University of Paris X, 1971) was a French philosopher and literary theorist. He is well-known for his articulation of postmodernism after the late 1970s and for his analysis of the impact of postmodernity on the human condition.He went to primary school at the Paris Lycées Buffon and Louis-le-Grand and later began studying philosophy at the Sorbonne. AfterThis was the primary source for my undergraduate thesis, which was written ten years ago and defended ten years ago to the month. I figured I should dust it off and see what I thought about it now after all these years, maybe see how much the book has aged or I've aged in the meantime. Fortunately, I think both have stood the test of time. The book is still a very enjoyable read for philosophy (that it's a conversation adds to the liveliness and accessibility), though certain parts didn't quite
A pretty good book on the concept of justice in the contemporary era.
Lyotard and Thébaud open Just Gaming by discussing Ls Libidinal Economy, a book L argues aims to produce effects rather than state truths (3). T sees Ls book as thus irresponsible, but L asserts all writingat least in modernityis irresponsible (8). For in modernityunlike in classicismthe author no longer knows for whom he writes (9). The dialogic approach of Just Gaming, however, situates it in a different language game than modern texts (8)at least until it becomes a book.L points to
a very useful elaboration of the ideas in the postmodern condition, relayed in the form of an ancient greek philosophic slapboxing contest. i mischaracterize: it's not that contentious. jean-loup could have been more difficult, but he comes around. we go here through the mess of how multiplicities of language games make it so that justice is entirely contingent, that a law for all sorts of situations doesn't really work, and he goes over the different situations of why it doesn't work. i don't
0 Comments